Law Enforcement

1. All government stored documents in hard copy or digitised must bear a watermark that includes an uneditable date of origin and unambiguous identification of the author.

2. No document cam be created by a telephone call.

3. Apart from physical medical & police matters, no government action can begin on a phone call.

4. All emergency mental health departments made redundant on the basis they’re used for abuse of process.

5. Police taser & bullets replaced with non-lethal stun drug applicators to render the alleged offender incapable of large muscle movement.

6. All gunpowder or projectile guns abolished, no exception.

7. All non kitchen knives abolished, no exception.

8. All string & bow projectile bows abolished, no exception.

9. If you feel the barbaric need to shoot at or kill something, you can do that electronically.

10. Instead of culling wild animals, render a small selection of them incapable of reproduction, preferably in the more disease prone areas.

VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

• QUOTE from a lawyer's website: "The term "vexatious" suggests that the litigant's purpose is to annoy, embarrass, or cause legal expense to the defendant with a baseless claim, rather than to bring a legitimate claim."

• Seriously?

• The Federal court rules 2011, QUOTE: Rule 2.26 Refusal to accept document for filing—abuse of process or frivolous or vexatious documents.

  A Registrar may refuse to accept a document (including a document that would,

  if accepted, become an originating application) if the Registrar is satisfied that

  the document is an abuse of the process of the Court or is frivolous or vexatious:

  (a) on the face of the document; or

  (b) by reference to any documents already filed or submitted for filing with the

  document.

• LINK to Federal Court Rules 2011

  • https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_reg/fcr2011186/

• Not only is the above is Rule 2.26 ambitious when the application or affidavit is rejected the registrar doesn't need to be specific on any legal evidence point whether they believe your documents is an "abuse" or its "frivolous" or its "vexatious" then point to your words that indicate the grounds for their belief your document failed to pass muster, they only need to quote this rule & you're out.

1. The term "vexatious" suggests that the Government seek to silence persons complaining about abuse of authority for some unconstitutional cause.

2. Indeed, the term "vexatious" been used against me by Judges Tribunal leaders, and Judicial Registrars (as my applications became more legally accurate) to illegally toss my valid claims out of the court system - because the respondent Government has no lawful defence therefore, there PUBLIC OFFICERS use the "vexatious" excuses to block their responsibility to pay damages or compensation for financial loss.

3. That's my personal experience.

4. The terms vexatious, baseless, annoy, embarrass, or cause legal expense must be removed from our judicial system - on the grounds that it's used primarily by a terrorist organisation controlling the court system to conceal organised crime.

• ... and then the Federal Court Rules 2011, contains this little gem used the same way with no need for specifics or compliance with 'rules of evidence' when it comes from the judiciary or the "party" that applies to the court under Rule 6.01. Its all "opinion" based which includes political opinions, the opinion of a local political cult branch, or opinion of Freemason cults generally or even opinion of Skippy the Bush Kangaroo - it's same unconstitutional BIAS opinion process police officers use to decide if a group of events are a crime, or are not:

Part 6—Court supervision of parties and other persons

Division 6.1—Vexatious proceedings

6.01 Scandalous, vexatious or oppressive matter.

If a document filed in a proceeding contains matter that is scandalous, vexatious or oppressive, a party may apply to the Court for an order that:

(a) the document be removed from the Court file; or

(b) the matter be struck out of the document.

• LINK to Federal Court Rules 2011

  • https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_reg/fcr2011186/

Contemptuous

• That Australians must have a lawyer to make sense of the Rules of the Court & the Regulations of the Court & the individual Acts or Torts they need to sue over, means it's Parliament who are the sole factor in the allegation of "abuse of process" by confounding the legal system into a complex mind field of stacked personal opinions.

A system of law enforcement in Australia, that any "reasonable" person can see, without the need for a lawyer, is designed specifically to defeat the natural course of justice and indirectly provide the total "balance of convenience" to the political parties who illegally control our parliaments.

• LINK to definition of, balance of convenience

  • https://legalvision.com.au/5-things-a-court-considers-when-granting-an-interlocutory-injunction/

COMPUTER COURT concept

1. Court decisions made by results from set of criteria with no back-door for allowing abuse of process by public officers or any other.

2. 100% computerised for artificial intelligence decision-making involving expert lawyers for each division of law, including law of Tort.

3. 100% anonymous by random number identification; based on unambiguous drop down list selections, no lawyer required.

4. One completed by each applicant

5. One completed by each respondent.

6. Only lawyer involvement at this stage when it's a Class action or the person in minor, or permanent intellectual disability, not including diagnosis of "delusional" or "paranoid" as they are primarily a political diagnosis.

7. Only evidence accepted will be previously dated official documents that are OCR scanned for AI decision analysis.

8. Only appeals go to Judicial court with 5 living judges for civil matters & for criminal matters, 3 judges & jury - always.

9. All judges to have no affiliations and constantly monitored for evidence of bribery.

10. All court hearings recorded on film & played 24 HOURS on permanent free to air television channels so that their hearing is seen that day or evening.

11. All recordings are treated like any goods and for sale at cost price via online store.

12. Jurisdictions separated by Free-to-Air channel for each matter or more when the numbers permit, ie: Adult civil; Adult criminal, Children’s criminal court; Family law court – court secrets protect criminal offenders and put public at risk.

13. Making law enforcement Free-to-Air TV public will ultimately reduce the offences.

All Complaints to COMPUTER COURTS

1. Government department prohibited from deciding complaints about themselves.

2. Alleged independent authority prohibited from deciding complaints about themselves.

3. Industry registrar prohibited from deciding complaints about their register professionals.

Revocations & Bans

1. Ambiguous words like “may” removed from all legislation.

2. Australia Act rescinded.

3. Tribunals outlawed.

4. Rules of the Court revoked.

5. Judicial Registrar powers to politically or unconstitutionally refuse court applications, automatically removed by the above changes.

Free Self-Help Rebate System

1. Where a person has one of these issues, successful participation should include a system of financial reward when they manage to cure or control themselves by these means.

2. Anger management, & confidence boosting programs FREE under Health Department rebate system regardless of income.

3. Drug & alcohol & food & gambling & sex addiction rehabilitation programs, all FREE under Health Department rebate system regardless of income.

4. Extensive research, by analysing response to an intelligent series of survey questions, into environment & diet for prevention of depression & prevention of dementia to steer us away from drugs as first alternative.

5. It's better to pay for a healthy community, than patch up people physically or psychologically harmed for life by an unhealthy one.

• School education from infancy to adulthood creates good & bad adults. One example: Camden NSW public school illegally ignored a parent's permission refusal for child to attend minor excursions as punishment for minor theft & anger issues. The child grew into an angry adult with no respect for their parent, many failed relationships & complete estrangement from their non-violent birth family & many fatherless Australia BORN children who've never met their Australia BORN grandparents, Australia BORN aunts or Australia BORN uncles because that's how our parliaments treat dissidents - people who oppose their political crimes.

• I'd sue only the criminal affiliations between Freemason & LABOR-LIBERAL cult BROTHERS IN ARMS means, I'm not recognised as a person before Australian law courts.

Those last two dot points are a peak at what 2025 good government looks like in AUSTRALIA's parliaments.

Out of sight, out of mind.