40 years on same parliament same bullshit
-
Seeing isn't always believing when the voters are brainwashed for the many Freemason causes to conceal child-rape & many murders, including REAL children & REAL police officers murdered by other REAL police officers for being honest Freemason police officers.
-
We can’t change the world but we can change Australia. Planet Earth is a global shopping mall but it's not a global economy or a global community, each region makes their own laws, or apply their own laws - illegally more often than legally.
-
From my personal evidence of illegal government documented illegal attacks from Australia officials, I’d estimate around 95% of the troubles people have in Australia can be directly related to direct willful & malicious actions of government public officers acting illegally & secretly, to illegally maintain their power base in parliament. The other 5% is a result of others acting-out their anger on others, for harms illegally inflicted on them by government public officers, as above.
-
When I was a student at East Campbelltown NSW State primary school (1962-1968) some of us played proper mind games associated with guessing something as "animal, vegetable, or mineral". That progressed to the game I loved the most which ended in:
“nuts grow on trees, trees are nature, nature’s beautiful, thanks for the compliment”
-
PEOPLE WHOSE INTELLECT IS LIMITED CALL LATERAL THINKERS CRAZY, that's been repeated through recorded history.
-
This was obviously (to me) my early training as a lawyer or logical thinking. Everything you can think of on our planet Earth can be stripped down to that line, “… are nature, nature’s beautiful, thanks for the compliment” because everything we have, have had, or will have, comes from this planet.
-
Apart from space debris like meteors. Reality is that as we depend on micro-organisms to keep us alive, the viruses that kill us probably came on the back of space debris like meteors.
-
Logical thinking is not something teachers teach because most teachers become teachers because they’re too unintelligent for anything else. Yes truth hurts. Truth will also set your mind free from brainwashing.
-
Mind exercises like the child’s game above are essential for the evolution of species like our own. Unfortunately your government seeks to stop you from logical thoughts, from proper mind games, they choose to play destructive mind games that hold our species from natural evolution of the mind into a peaceful species. Our governments seek to promote war above all else. They thrive in an environment of conflict, they generate personal wealth on the economics of conflict.
We can’t change the world but we can change Australia.
TERRORISM DEFINED & CIVIL WAR DECLARED BY AUSTRALIA'S PARLIAMENTS
I’m not allowed to have illegal implants removed, causing me infection and 30 years of agony - but marathon runners have been known to have toenail beds removed so they don’t cause problems falling off during events.
-
Bet you didn't know BONE CONDUCTION headphone implants linked to TRANSCEIVER & RANGE BOOSTER also illegally implanted inside me as part of Australia's 1980s to 1990s COCHLEAR HEARING research.<https://youtu.be/xzPuWuhGpj0> The Science of How Bone Conduction Headphones Work
-
<https://youtu.be/0Uqf71muwWc> Unlocking a car with your Brain - Sixty Symbols. (c2014)
<https://www.runnersworld.com/health-injuries/a20864996/do-runners-need-toenails/>
-
Federal Police & Nine Network both refuse to publish or investigate these crimes against AUSTRALIANS engineered by Australia's Party Faithful & elected parliament.
-
<https://www.9news.com.au/national/federal-politics-2025-peter-dutton-speaks-on-reported-targeting-of-alleged-terror-plot-anthony-albanese-shows-support/2c5789b0-f35f-44ab-b6a1-7ef9bdf62604>
That 3 (Federal, NSW & SA) - “THREE” Australia Government jurisdictions of Health & Police Departments have illegally UNCONSTITUTIONALLY joined forces against me to criminally defame me by their direct action, indirectly blocking my Australian right to have illegal implants removed – then that proves they’re 100% responsible for the illegal implants inside me since at least 1991 to cover up their Freemason police family murders on Fathers Day 1984 in (then) Federal electorate of Australia’s Labor Party treasurer Paul John KEATING. Now in 2025 they refuse to let me hire a lawyer to sue them & refuse to let me tell the story of their crimes in Australia’s news. That’s terrorism.
What this means in the real world of politics is that those you’re told by the TV & news stories are the wonderfully empathetic, religious & professional leaders of Australia’s Parliaments are in reality low life scum who stole everything they have from people like me, who they privately virtually destroy & suffocate under a mountain of Government funded physical assaults and propaganda like … moving forward ... “One dark night in the middle of the day two dead men got up to fight, back to back they faced each other, drew their swords & shot each other” it’s a circa 1960s children’s nonsense & perfect description of 21st century Australian politics – impossible narratives, misleading contradictions presented as logical solutions gobbled up by greedy "body, fat" voters as true fact. One TV network interviewed a family (pre-election) with about three children the parents complaining of their high food bill, the entire family were obese.
It's NOT okay to be fat. Voluntary fat people is a national pandemic in Australia - they drive up supermarket prices and hog medical services with voluntary fat-people conditions. Voluntary fat people should be financially penalised - a body weight tax might be a bloody good idea.
See also my facebook page Author Janette Gail FRANCIS https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61566986169515
MOVING FORWARD MALICIOUSLY
one illegal implant at a time
KEEPING LABOR & LIBERAL IN PARLIAMENT
Evidence the LABOR-LIBERAL experiment has terminally failed
BLOG LINK: https://magnachartaparty.wixsite.com/blog
Pursuant to Australian Consumer Law, we are entitled to refund of the money paid to LABOR-LIBERAL parliamentarians for their 'service provision in trade or commerce'; and file a lawsuit on the LABOR-LIBERAL corporate entities pursuant to 'section 19 Misleading or deceptive conduct' based on a choice of 'unconscionable conduct' or 'false advertising'.
https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/caca2010265/
False promises are made to secure votes to return LABOR or LIBERAL cults to power in parliaments - this is an offence under section 329 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. What's interesting is that evidently only the major parties are allowed to sue each other. Below is evidence that incurs the wrong-doer up to 3 years prison, either me or the Federal Court of Australia alleged registrar who signed the fraudulent letter as registrar Alissa CRITTENDEN. I have the evidence, so it's not me.
HIGH COURT & FEDERAL COURT of Australia CRIMINAL FRAUD
-
Link - <https://drive.proton.me/urls/HAZ2VWMST8#4A2cMt39pGh5> ALP BRIBED FCA Registrar TERRORIST Alissa CRITTENDEN 56-pgs 2022-01-10 FRANCIS v Australian LABOR PARTY & 59 ORS.pdf
-
In the Federal election "relevant period" of January 2022 - I'd attempted to lawfully sue Australian LABOR PARTY & named others for irrefutable evidence based terrorist acts, involving criminal assault, illegal imprisonment, false defamation in secret government records - but the clerical staff in the SYDNEY registry of the Federal Court of Australia illegally blocked that lawful & proper application. So that it's not on the record.
-
However, this is still an offence under section 329 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 which means the Sydney REGISTRAR of the Federal Court of Australia is liable to 3 years imprisonment, but oddly no person is interested in enforcing this Australian law.
-
<https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/cea1918233/s329.html>
-
In case you're not legally minded, the legal inference of the (criminal) intent of the (Alissa CRITTENDEN) author of the letter to me is identified by the reference line stated as (thus) "Re: Documents presented for filing on 5 January 2022" instead of stating the identification of the matter usually identified thus;
-
"your proposed lawsuit" or
-
"the matter of Janette Gail Francis v Australian Labor Party and others" or
-
"FRANCIS v Australian Labor Party ORS"
-
Indicator that this document may have been criminally repurposed by 'other' office staff from another matter comes from the statement, "Your Documents are returned to you" it was an electronic filing not hard copy, you can't return electronic documents they're just deleted. I have many guesses who 'done it' spanning from Labor Party Faithful FCA office staff to Labor Party email hackers - based on overt omission of the words "Labor" and "Party" from their email and email attachment letter to me.
HIGH COURT of Australia CRIMINAL FRAUD
-
However, I'm more convinced on the hacker scenario based on the fact I had been forced to make multiple electronic applications to High Court of Australia for Mandamus on Federal Court Registrar, but each emailed application was unconstitutionally rejected. I wanted a response from a Judge to confirm it's unofficially POLITICALLY prohibited to sue a political party for organised terrorism in Australia - so I persisted until I got my evidence.
-
FOLDER LINK High Court Mandamus Copy 2022 Filed - https://drive.proton.me/urls/GT9P83VH6W#qpTceixEQXFs - 5 applications for Writ of Mandamus, 19 associated PDF documents, 17 filed, 1 Judicial refusal
-
A service provider who doesn't actually charge for the service can be sued if they advertise that service under written or verbal contract (ergo election) - then yes, they most certainly can be sued under Australian Consumer Law.
The key is in the words "in trade or commerce" I expect a considerable amount of spin in attempts to wriggle out of that legal bind that's not been made public in mainstream news industry, but most certainly been said before about the LABOR-LIBERAL corporate cult.
Moreover, it is justifiable to state that the LABOR-LIBERAL corporate entities have colluded in a cartel to impose legislative restrictions that damage competition, for example requiring 100 voters to nominate a non-Party delegate for election when a Party with sitting members needs none; and requiring 1,500 voter members to form a new registered political Party when a sitting member can form a registered party of one member, themselves.
https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2004A00109/latest/versions
Note: in all my websites below, I talk about my experiences,
because that's where my evidence is,
not because I want or need to be the centre of attention.
Quite the opposite.
VEXATIOUS LITIGANT FARCE part A
QUOTE from a lawyer's website: "The term "vexatious" suggests that the litigant's purpose is to annoy, embarrass, or cause legal expense to the defendant with a baseless claim, rather than to bring a legitimate claim."
Seriously?
The Federal court rules 2011, QUOTE: Rule 2.26 Refusal to accept document for filing—abuse of process or frivolous or vexatious documents.
A Registrar may refuse to accept a document (including a document that would,
if accepted, become an originating application) if the Registrar is satisfied that
the document is an abuse of the process of the Court or is frivolous or vexatious:
(a) on the face of the document; or
(b) by reference to any documents already filed or submitted for filing with the
document.
LINK to Federal Court Rules 2011
VEXATIOUS LITIGANT FARCE part B
Not only is the above is Rule 2.26 ambitious when the application or affidavit is rejected the registrar doesn't need to be specific on any legal evidence point whether they believe your documents is an "abuse" or its "frivolous" or its "vexatious" then point to your words that indicate the grounds for their belief your document failed to pass muster, they only need to quote this rule & you're out.
The term "vexatious" suggests that the Government seek to silence persons complaining about abuse of authority for some unconstitutional cause.
Indeed, the term "vexatious" been used against me by Judges Tribunal leaders, and Judicial Registrars (as my applications became more legally accurate) to illegally toss my valid claims out of the court system - because the respondent Government has no lawful defence therefore, there PUBLIC OFFICERS use the "vexatious" excuses to block their responsibility to pay damages or compensation for financial loss.
That's my personal experience.
The terms vexatious, baseless, annoy, embarrass, or cause legal expense must be removed from our judicial system - on the grounds that it's used primarily by a terrorist organisation controlling the court system to conceal organised crime.
VEXATIOUS LITIGANT FARCE part C
... and then the Federal Court Rules 2011, contains this little gem used the same way with no need for specifics or compliance with 'rules of evidence' when it comes from the judiciary or the "party" that applies to the court under Rule 6.01. Its all "opinion" based which includes political opinions, the opinion of a local political cult branch, or opinion of Freemason cults generally or even opinion of Skippy the Bush Kangaroo - it's same unconstitutional BIAS opinion process police officers use to decide if a group of events are a crime, or are not:
Part 6—Court supervision of parties and other persons
Division 6.1—Vexatious proceedings
6.01 Scandalous, vexatious or oppressive matter.
If a document filed in a proceeding contains matter that is scandalous, vexatious or oppressive, a party may apply to the Court for an order that:
(a) the document be removed from the Court file; or
(b) the matter be struck out of the document.
LINK to Federal Court Rules 2011
VEXATIOUS LITIGANT FARCE part D
It's Utterly Contemptuous Disrespect that in 2025 ...
That Australians must have a lot of disposable assets to hire a lawyer to make sense of the Rules of the Court & the Regulations of the Court & the individual Acts or Torts they need to sue over, means it's Parliament who are the sole factor in the allegation of "abuse of process" by confounding the legal system into a complex mind field of stacked personal opinions.
A system of law enforcement in Australia, that any "reasonable" person can see, without the need for a lawyer, is designed specifically to defeat the natural course of justice and indirectly provide the total "balance of convenience" to the political parties who illegally control our parliaments.
LINK to definition of, balance of convenience
Misfeasance in Public office https://youtu.be/0cLrdqY-cUU
SAVE AUSTRALIA join the MC PARTY
Address
34 Whitestone Cres, Seaford Rise SA 5169, Australia
ABN
80092978734